Fund of Private Equity Funds: A Strategic Approach to Diversified Investing

Private equity investing has long been the domain of institutional players and ultra-high-net-worth individuals, offering access to high-growth, high-return opportunities that traditional markets often lack. However, investing directly in private equity funds comes with barriers—minimum capital commitments can run into the millions, portfolios lack liquidity, and investors must conduct deep due diligence to select the right managers. This is where fund of private equity funds (FoFs) emerges as an attractive alternative, offering a diversified, professionally managed approach to private equity investing.

A fund of funds (FoF) is a pooled investment vehicle that allocates capital across multiple private equity funds, effectively providing investors with exposure to a broad mix of managers, sectors, and geographies. Instead of investing directly in a single private equity fund, FoF investors gain access to a curated portfolio of funds selected by experienced professionals. This structure reduces risk through diversification, enables investors to tap into top-tier private equity firms, and provides a more accessible entry point for those looking to participate in the asset class without having to vet individual funds themselves.

Yet, FoF investing isn’t without its trade-offs. While it offers exposure to a wider range of investment opportunities, it also introduces an extra layer of fees, liquidity constraints, and potential performance dilution. Understanding how FoFs operate, their advantages, and the challenges they pose is key for investors looking to determine whether they align with long-term portfolio objectives.

Table of Contents

Understanding Fund of Private Equity Funds: How It Enhances Diversification

At its core, a fund of private equity funds is designed to spread investment risk across multiple managers, strategies, and regions, reducing the concentration risk that comes with investing in a single private equity fund. Since private equity funds often focus on specific sectors, deal structures, or geographic regions, an investor concentrating capital into one fund inherently ties performance to a narrower set of outcomes. A well-structured FoF, by contrast, creates a layered investment approach that mitigates risks associated with any single fund underperforming.

This diversified exposure makes FoFs particularly attractive to institutional investors, pension funds, and family offices that seek private equity exposure while maintaining portfolio stability. Rather than conducting due diligence on individual funds, investors rely on FoF managers to select, allocate, and rebalance capital among high-performing funds. These managers leverage their industry networks, research capabilities, and historical performance data to build portfolios that balance risk, return potential, and liquidity constraints.

For instance, consider an institutional investor looking to allocate $100 million into private equity. Rather than committing the full amount to one or two general partners (GPs), an FoF investment might distribute that capital among 10–15 underlying funds, spanning various sectors like healthcare, technology, and energy, as well as different stages, from venture capital to buyouts.

This reduces the impact of underperformance from any single fund, helping investors capture broader private market trends while lowering downside risk.

Another major draw of FoFs is access to top-performing private equity managers. Many of the most sought-after private equity firms operate on an invitation-only basis, restricting access to well-established LP relationships or large minimum capital commitments. Through an FoF structure, investors can gain exposure to these elite funds indirectly, leveraging the fund manager’s access and relationships to participate in opportunities that might otherwise be out of reach.

However, this broad exposure comes with trade-offs in return potential. Because FoFs invest in multiple private equity funds—each with its own management fees and carried interest structures—investors face a layered cost structure that can impact net returns. While the benefits of diversification often outweigh this cost for risk-averse investors, those seeking higher direct returns may prefer investing in single private equity funds to avoid additional fee drag.

Key Advantages of Investing in a Private Equity Fund of Funds

Investing in a private equity fund of funds offers several strategic benefits that make it a compelling choice for investors looking to enter the private markets while maintaining risk-adjusted exposure. The three primary advantages include diversification, access to exclusive funds, and professional fund selection and management.

Diversification Across Funds, Sectors, and Geographies

One of the biggest advantages of a private equity FoF is its ability to spread risk across multiple funds, asset classes, and geographies. While a traditional private equity fund typically invests in 10-15 companies, an FoF, through its multiple fund investments, may provide exposure to over 100 portfolio companies. This broad diversification significantly reduces the risk of capital impairment tied to any single company, sector, or economic downturn.

For example, during the global financial crisis of 2008, many single-manager private equity funds struggled with liquidity issues and investment markdowns, while well-diversified FoFs were able to stabilize returns through exposure to multiple asset classes and regions. A study by Cambridge Associates found that FoFs with diversified private equity exposure had lower return volatility compared to direct PE fund investments, reinforcing the role of diversification in managing downside risk.

Access to Elite Private Equity Funds

Top-performing private equity funds are not easily accessible—many of the most successful managers have closed funds, high minimum investment thresholds, and longstanding LP relationships that restrict entry. By pooling capital from multiple investors, FoFs can gain entry into these top-tier funds, allowing smaller investors to participate in opportunities that would otherwise be out of reach.

Consider funds managed by firms like Sequoia Capital, Blackstone, or KKR—all of which often restrict LP allocations to existing investors or require commitments exceeding $10 million.

Through an FoF, investors can gain exposure to these premier firms without having to meet such capital thresholds.

Professional Management and Due Diligence

Private equity investing requires extensive due diligence, manager selection, and ongoing monitoring—tasks that demand deep industry expertise and significant time commitments. FoF managers specialize in conducting rigorous fund evaluations, monitoring performance metrics, and adjusting allocations to optimize returns.

This active management approach is particularly valuable for institutional investors, high-net-worth individuals, and family offices that lack the internal resources to conduct independent fund analysis. With FoFs, investors effectively outsource the fund selection process to experienced professionals, reducing the risk of choosing underperforming or misaligned funds.

Liquidity Management and Secondary Market Flexibility

While private equity funds are typically illiquid with long lock-up periods, many FoFs offer secondary market access, allowing investors to trade fund stakes or adjust allocations as needed. This provides an additional layer of liquidity flexibility, making it easier to manage portfolio rebalancing over time.

Challenges and Cost Considerations in Fund of Funds Investing

While a fund of private equity funds (FoF) offers diversification, access to exclusive managers, and professional fund selection, it also comes with challenges that investors must carefully evaluate. Liquidity constraints, fee structures, and potential performance drag are key considerations that can impact net returns.

One of the primary drawbacks of FoFs is liquidity limitations. Private equity is already an illiquid asset class, but investing through an FoF adds another layer of lock-up periods and capital commitment cycles. Since FoFs invest in multiple private equity funds, capital is often locked in for 10-15 years, with limited opportunities for early redemption. This extended investment horizon may not suit investors who require liquidity flexibility or need access to capital within shorter time frames.

Another significant challenge is the cost structure of fund of funds investing. Private equity funds charge management fees (typically 1.5% to 2%) and carried interest (often 20%) on profits, but FoFs introduce an additional layer of fees. Investors in an FoF pay both the fees of the underlying private equity funds and the management fees of the FoF itself, leading to what is often called fee layering or fee drag.

Take the case of an investor committing capital to a typical FoF structure:

The underlying private equity funds charge a 2% management fee and 20% carried interest.
The FoF manager charges a separate 0.5%-1% management fee and an additional carried interest of 5-10%.
This means an investor could effectively be paying 3% in management fees and up to 30% in performance-based fees, significantly reducing net returns.

A 2023 report from Preqin found that investors in traditional private equity FoFs experienced an average net return reduction of 3-5 percentage points annually due to fee layering, reinforcing why cost-conscious investors must carefully assess fee structures before committing capital.

Beyond fees, another challenge is performance dilution. Since an FoF invests across multiple private equity funds, it provides broad exposure but often at the cost of reducing the potential for outsized returns. While a top-performing direct private equity fund might generate 20%-30% annualized returns, an FoF, after fees, might yield 12%-15%, as gains from the best-performing funds are averaged out with lower-performing ones.

Manager selection also plays a crucial role in FoF performance variability. While diversification mitigates risk, it does not eliminate the possibility of exposure to underperforming funds. If an FoF manager fails to select high-quality GPs or misallocates capital, the overall fund performance may suffer. Unlike a direct private equity investor, who can closely manage and optimize fund selection, FoF investors rely on the skill and discretion of the fund manager, which introduces an additional layer of execution risk.

Despite these challenges, FoFs remain a viable strategy for investors who prioritize diversification over maximizing absolute returns. Institutional investors, pension funds, and long-term allocators often accept higher fee structures in exchange for professional fund selection, risk management, and access to exclusive funds. However, investors must carefully assess the liquidity trade-offs, cost implications, and overall fit within their broader portfolio strategy to ensure an FoF aligns with their investment objectives.

How Private Equity Fund of Funds Fit into Institutional and High-Net-Worth Portfolios

Institutional investors and high-net-worth individuals (HNWIs) increasingly view private equity FoFs as a key component of their alternative investment allocations. While direct investments in private equity offer higher return potential, FoFs provide a structured, lower-risk approach to gaining private market exposure, making them attractive for investors seeking consistent returns, professional oversight, and broad portfolio diversification.

Institutional Adoption of Private Equity FoFs

Pension funds, insurance companies, and endowments often allocate 5%-15% of their portfolios to private equity, using FoFs to reduce risk while maintaining long-term exposure to the asset class. Large institutions value FoFs for their ability to spread risk across multiple funds and managers, ensuring stable returns without concentrated exposure to a single GP.

For example, the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS), one of the largest pension funds in the U.S., has historically allocated billions to private equity FoFs to enhance diversification and gain access to top-performing GPs.

By investing through FoFs, CalPERS is able to tap into niche funds, emerging managers, and sector-specific strategies that complement its broader private equity portfolio.

How High-Net-Worth Individuals Use FoFs

For high-net-worth individuals, direct private equity investing can be challenging due to high capital requirements and the need for deep industry expertise. Many HNW investors lack the resources or time to conduct thorough due diligence on multiple private equity funds, making FoFs a convenient entry point into private markets.

Rather than committing millions to a single GP, HNW investors can participate in an FoF with a lower minimum investment threshold (often $250,000-$500,000), gaining access to a diversified set of funds without the need for active portfolio management. This is particularly beneficial for family offices and first-time private equity investors who want broad exposure with professional oversight.

Strategic Portfolio Allocation with FoFs

From a portfolio construction perspective, FoFs serve as an effective hedge against single-fund volatility, allowing investors to participate in multiple private equity strategies without overconcentrating risk.

A well-structured portfolio might allocate:

50% to direct private equity funds (buyouts, growth equity, venture capital).
30% to fund of funds for diversification and risk balancing.
20% to secondary market transactions or co-investments for liquidity and opportunistic plays.

This blended approach ensures that investors benefit from the high-return potential of direct private equity funds while maintaining the stability and professional oversight of an FoF allocation.

Looking at historical performance, FoFs have delivered consistent long-term returns. According to a 2023 Cambridge Associates study, private equity FoFs generated average net IRRs of 12%-15% over the past 20 years, demonstrating their ability to provide steady returns with lower volatility compared to single-fund investments.

Ultimately, private equity fund of funds fit well within institutional and high-net-worth portfolios as a risk-mitigating, diversification-enhancing investment vehicle. While they may not deliver the highest absolute returns, their ability to smooth out volatility, provide access to exclusive managers, and offer professional fund selection makes them a valuable tool for investors looking to build long-term private equity exposure.

Investing in a fund of private equity funds (FoF) presents a compelling strategy for investors seeking diversification, professional oversight, and access to top-tier private equity managers. By pooling capital across multiple funds, FoFs mitigate single-fund risk, reduce volatility, and provide exposure to a broad spectrum of investment strategies. However, investors must carefully weigh liquidity constraints, fee structures, and potential performance dilution when considering an FoF allocation. While institutions and high-net-worth investors increasingly utilize FoFs to optimize private market exposure, success ultimately depends on selecting experienced fund managers with a proven track record in portfolio construction and risk management. For those who prioritize stable, long-term private equity returns over maximizing absolute gains, FoFs offer a structured, lower-risk approach to alternative investing.